Documents Home 1st 3 year Consortium Application 1st Consortium Progress Report 2nd Consortium Progress Report 3rd Consortium Progress Report 4th Consortium Progress Report 5th Consortium Progress Report Special Progress Report 2nd 3 year Consortium Application 3 Year LogFrame (1998-01) Report on LFA Workshop 6th Consortium Progress Report 7th Consortium Progress Report 8th Consortium Progress Report Report on GP 2000 Elections 9th Consortium Progress Report 10th Consortium Progress Report 11th Consortium Progress Report 10 Year LogFrame (2001-10) 3rd Consortium Application (2001-04) 12th Consortium Progress Report 13th Consortium Progress Report 14th Consortium Progress Report 15th Consortium Progress Report 2nd Effects Monitoring Report 3rd Effects Monitoring Report 4th Effects Monitoring Report 5th Effects Monitoring Report ADATS/Coolie Sangha Strategic Plan (2009-19) Project Application to ICCO/EED (2009-12) 2nd Progress Report to EED 3rd Progress Report to Icco 6th Effects Monitoring Report 4th Progress Report to EED (Sep 2010) 7th Effects Monitoring Report (Apr 2011) 5th Progress Report to EED (Apr 2011) Annual Report to Icco (Jan 2012) 8th Effects Monitoring Report (Jun 2012) Project Application to EED (2013-15) Progress Report in the EED Format (2011-12) Annual Report to Icco (Dec 2012) 7th Progress Report in the EED Format (May 2013)
Documents of ADATS - Book 3
9th Progress Report (Mar 2000)
- There are 14,729 active Member Coolie families in 581 functioning CSUs in the 4 Extension taluks.
- This means a rise of 85 villages and 998 families during the last 6 months.
- Population coverage has dropped to 26% (down from 35% on 30 September 1999) due to the addition of relatively large villages where less percentage of the population are from the Coolie caste-class.
- Compared to the 2 year old 2nd Consortium Application, the present membership figures represent a substantial rise of 74 villages (507 to 581) and 139 Member Coolie families (14,590 to 14,729).
- Though the ethnic composition of the membership has changed only slightly, it is still worrisome that strength of SC/ST families within the CSUs has dropped by a further 2% — they now comprise only 58% of the membership.
- There is a huge change in the ethnic coverage figures because of the drop in overall coverage — i.e. the taking on of more (and larger) villages has resulted in only 33% of the SC/ST population being in the CSUs (down from 43% in September 1999), 28% of middle castes (down from 37% in September 1999), and 15% of upper castes (down from 21% in September 1999).