")}("position","absolute",["/lib/bootswatch/dist/cosmo/bootstrap.min.css"],"rel=\u0022stylesheet\u0022 integrity=\u0022sha256-rXpIL674TvYOUw0PG2bXssX5fO2HK0kFZhy2c/z2ie4=\u0022 crossorigin=\u0022anonymous\u0022 ");
Lockdown was just an immediate initial response to gain an understanding of the never-before-seen “novel” coronavirus. Irrespective of how it was presented to the population, it was never intended to be the magic bullet to defeat COVID-19. To therefore call it a knee jerk reaction that failed, even if it did not give anticipated results, would be wrong. It has given us time to plan a more realistic and effective response.
A critical examination of learning gained — epidemiology, virology, response protocols — is the urgent need of the hour. On the other hand, pretending to be infallible and refusing to examine even limited results and failures will be the stupidest course to take.